tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944079581687608453.post394871632198227281..comments2024-03-18T18:08:58.999+00:00Comments on Army Service Numbers 1881-1918: 4th Lincolnshire RegimentPaul Nixonhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12354531380984476532noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1944079581687608453.post-6884445812989869882009-04-04T14:14:00.000+01:002009-04-04T14:14:00.000+01:00Paul,The possible reason for the ad-hoc numbering ...Paul,<BR/>The possible reason for the ad-hoc numbering in 1908 might be because the TF on it's formation had 'no guidlines' as regards numbering. This is reflected in their first copy of TF Regulations 1908, which makes no mention of numbering for the TF what-so-ever and so you may come across a hotch-potch of old and new numbers which require sorting out.<BR/><BR/>As we both know TF Regs for 1912 are quite clear on the numbering situation, but it remains to be seen how the initial mess was cleared up in 1908. An AO or *WOI muct have been issued to help solve the problem.<BR/><BR/>Graham.<BR/><BR/>*WOI "War Office Instruction" pre-dates ACI's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com